Skip to content

You are here

The NLRB public website may experience intermittent outages during scheduled maintenance activities
on Wednesday, October 23rd, 2019 from 10:00 PM until Thursday, October 24th 2:00 AM EDT.

We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Effective October 21, 2019, parties to unfair labor practice or representation cases processed in NLRB Regional Offices must submit all written statements, correspondence, position statements, documentary or any other evidence through the Agency’s electronic filing system (E-Filing). 

Click on the NLRB’s NEW My Account Portal Link to

·        Create an account or access your existing  E-Filing account

·        View your E-Filing History

·        E-File documents in a case or inquiry to which you are a party

·        Manage the contact information associated with your account.

Board Adopts Contract Coverage Standard for Determining Whether Unilateral Changes Violate the Act

WASHINGTON, DC—In a decision issued today, the National Labor Relations Board adopted the “contract coverage” standard for determining whether a unionized employer’s unilateral change in a term or condition of employment violates the National Labor Relations Act. In doing so, the Board abandoned the “clear and unmistakable waiver” standard, which has been rejected by several federal courts of appeals, notably including the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which has plenary jurisdiction to review Board rulings. The decision is M.V. Transportation, Inc. (28-CA-173726; 368 NLRB No. 66).

Under the “contract coverage” or “covered by the contract” standard, the Board will examine the plain language of the parties’ collective-bargaining agreement to determine whether the change made by the employer was within the compass or scope of contractual language granting the employer the right to act unilaterally. If it was, the Board will honor the plain terms of the parties’ agreement and the employer will not have violated the Act by making the change without bargaining. If the agreement does not cover the employer’s disputed action, the employer will have violated the Act unless it demonstrates that the union waived its right to bargain over the change or that it was privileged to act unilaterally for some other reason.  

Under the now-abandoned “clear and unmistakable waiver” standard, the Board would find that an employer’s unilateral change violated the Act unless a contractual provision unequivocally and specifically referred to the type of employer action at issue. Although the Board reaffirmed that standard in 2007 and has adhered to it ever since, the D.C. Circuit has applied the “contract coverage” standard for more than 25 years, and it sanctioned the Board in 2016 for continuing to advocate for application of the “clear and unmistakable waiver” standard in proceedings before that court.

In addition to pointing out the futility of adhering to a standard unenforceable in the D.C. Circuit, the Board said that the “contract coverage” standard is more consistent with the purposes of the Act, explaining that it will encourage parties to anticipate and resolve potential labor-management issues through comprehensive collective bargaining and to settle unilateral-change disputes through grievance arbitration.

Chairman John F. Ring was joined by Members Marvin E. Kaplan and William J. Emanuel in the majority opinion. Member Lauren McFerran dissented in relevant part. 

Established in 1935, the National Labor Relations Board is an independent federal agency that protects employees and employers from unfair labor practices and protects the right of private sector employees to join together, with or without a union, to improve wages, benefits and working conditions. The NLRB conducts hundreds of workplace elections and investigates thousands of unfair labor practice charges each year.

Connect with Us