Summary of NLRB Decisions for Week of May 30 - June 2, 2023

The Summary of NLRB Decisions is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to substitute for the opinions of the NLRB.  Inquiries should be directed to the Office of the Executive Secretary at 202‑273‑1940.

Summarized Board Decisions

No Published Decisions Issued.

***

Unpublished Board Decisions in Representation and Unfair Labor Practice Cases

R Cases

No Unpublished R Cases Issued.

C Cases

Starbucks Corporation  (19-CA-295708, et al.)  Portland, OR, May 30, 2023.  The Board denied the Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss specified paragraphs of the consolidated amended complaint.  The Respondent had not demonstrated that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, nor any other valid basis for dismissal.  Charges filed by Workers United Labor Union International, a/w Service Employees International Union.  Members Kaplan, Wilcox, and Prouty participated.

Apple, Inc.  (10-CA-295915)  Atlanta, GA, June 1, 2023.  The Board denied the Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss a specified paragraph of the complaint.  The Respondent had not demonstrated that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.  Charge filed by the Communications Workers of America.  Members Kaplan, Wilcox, and Prouty participated.

United Parcel Service, Inc.  (31-CA-255584)  San Bernardino, CA, June 2, 2023.  No exceptions having been filed to the April 19, 2023 decision of Administrative Law Judge Amita Baman Tracy’s decision that deferral to the arbitrator’s decision was appropriate and ordered the complaint to be dismissed.  Charge filed by Teamsters Local 63.

Hispanic Society of America  (02-CA-290042)  New York, NY, June 2, 2023.  No exceptions having been filed to the April 21, 2023 decision of Administrative Law Judge Lauren Esposito’s finding that the Respondent had engaged in certain unfair labor practices, the Board adopted the judge’s findings and conclusions, and ordered the Respondent to take the action set forth in the judge’s recommended Order.  Charge filed by Technical, Office and Professional Workers, Local 2110, UAW.

***

Appellate Court Decisions

No Appellate Court Decisions involving Board Decisions to report.

***

Administrative Law Judge Decisions

Starbucks Corporation  (14-CA-300065; JD-35-23)  Wichita, KS.  Administrative Law Judge Michael A. Rosas issued his decision on May 30, 2023.  Charge filed by Service Employees International Union Local 513.

North Mountain Foothills Apartments, LLC  (28-CA-286885; JD-34-23)  Phoenix, AZ.  Administrative Law Judge Andrew S. Gollin issued his decision on May 30, 2023.  Charge filed by an individual.

Starbucks Corporation  (19-CA-295850; JD(SF)-14-23)  Seattle, WA.  Administrative Law Judge Amita Baman Tracy issued her decision on May 31, 2023.  Charge filed by Workers United Labor Union International, a/w Service Employees International Union.

Redi Carpet, Inc.  (16-CA-292266; JD-36-23)  Stafford, TX. Administrative Law Judge Sharon Levinson Steckler issued her decision on June 1, 2023.  Charge filed by an individual.

Refresco Beverages US, Inc.  (22-CA-294330 and 22-CA-294642; JD(NY)-10-23)  Newark, NJ.  Administrative Law Judge Kenneth W. Chu issued his decision on June 2, 2023.  Charges filed by United Electric, Radio, and Machine Workers of America (UE), Local 115.

***

To have the NLRB’s Weekly Summary of Cases delivered to your inbox each week, please subscribe here.