Home

Reports

Reviewing Reports

Request for Information Submissions

Showing 5001 - 6000 of 6943. Show 10 | 50 | 100 | 1000 | All results per page.

Name	Response	Attachments	Submitted Sort ascending
FDouglas Richmond	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
David Galli	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
William Schachtner	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Stewart Engelman	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Raymond F. Ferguson	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Ron Bentley	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Dennis Anderson	Please stop forced unionism on workers and the mandatory dues they have to pay, whether or not they approve of what the union does with their money. Workers should have independence and rights to decide what they want to do. CAPTCHA	No Attachments	2018-04-12
J. Glennie	No 'quickie' elections; require at least 60 days between notice of election and the actual election day.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Charles Daniel	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Douglas Day	Recind the 2014 rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted or the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Linda Myrick	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Jennifer Loving	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Anonymous	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Milton L Johnson	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Amy Syrellforc	The 2014 Election Rule should be rescinded. I don't know about the previous rules. No one should be forced to join any union or forced to pay dues to any union unless they're members.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Mark Drastal	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Workers should be able to vote in privacy and without fear of job loss or personal harm. The NLRB should hold the elections and review the results without the interference of the unions themselves.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Susan Jones	Please repeal the ambush election scheme. I believe unions should be voluntary, and no one should be required to pay dues or join a union to which they do not wish to belong.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Jon Blough	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Jon Blough	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
John E. Persons	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Hans F Hansen	Rescind the 2014 election rule. I believe that closed shop unions should be made illegal. If a closed shop union raises union dues by 40% nobody quits their job to get out of the union. Open shop would prevent this.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Robert Wogerman	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
John C Poe	I would like information about the above document. I think everyone has a need to work and if hired should not be compelled to join a union. In addition I think public unions have no place in these United States.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
wildeysenate@optonline,net	NO government agency should come between a business and an employee. This should be a free exchange WITHOUT any government INVOLVEMENT. THE GOVERNMENT THAT GOVERNS BEST, GOVERNS LEAST	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Peter Jerabek	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Arthur Davis	No applicant who is qualified for a job should be forced to join a union as a condition of employment. Workers should be afforded freedom of association.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Marc Green	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
sweetsuzee	It's very plain and simple rescind the 2014 Rule. America has become so litigious that no one needs a union to protect their rights any longer. Everyone knows how to protect themselves and the unions have been ripping the taxpayers off for too long.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Kim Virkler	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Brian Ko	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Steven Woodruff	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Randolph herdman	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Albert Kegley	Do away with 2014 rule.That forced unionization.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Thomas Lake	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
David sugarman	Unions are just socialistic indoctrination that takes away free trade, as the Founder's would prefer for this Nation. Its time is done, with anti-trust laws to cover monopolies, we can't afford to go down this aggressive path for the future!	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Roger Clark	The 2014 Election Rule needs to be recinded. No worker should be forced to support union backed politicians whose views they do not agree with. In my career I was forced to financially support many candidates that I would never voted for.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Ronald Mauselle	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Mark Brindle	Rescind the 2014 Rule.......protect workers from being trapped in unions they oppose. I Support National Right To Work.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Steve Dunham	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
John Pirogowicz	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Michael Gavin	RESCIND the 2014 Rule! Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
clarence ensminger	I FEEL UNION MEMBERSHIP SHOULD BE VOLUNTARY, IF THE MEMBER AGREES WITH THE UNIONS VIEWS, THE MEMBER SHOULD PAY DUES TO THAT UNION; HOWEVER IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THE POSITION, ONE SHOULD NOT BE FORCED TO COMPLY OR PPAY DUES TO THAT UNION.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Wallace A. Toney	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Barbara M Piel	I have never believed in Labor Unions! Even when husband making good $ - always short lived and on unemployment more. Dis incentive to find other work and all financial burden on me.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Robert Dunham	Cancel the 2014 Rule. All unions should be required to document that the majority of subject employees are in favor of the union's representation or continuation of representation.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
David Cawley	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Keith Wall	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re certify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Jennifer R. Wolfe	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Mary Johnson	Don't trap workers into unions they don't want. Allow individual freedom of choice.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Jo Hurst	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Michael F. Koeller	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
robert norberg	repeal the 2014 election rule!!!	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Robin Flatt Homa	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Herman Stanford	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Gerald Wilson	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Timothy Burns	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Larry D. Wilkes	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Barbara Mintz	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
John K	Please rescind the 2014 rule. Also, please require periodic recertification of a union's authorization so that as workers leave and new ones begin working they are not forced to be part of a union unless they choose to.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Donald Mccormick	UNIONS have GREAT amount of POWER over what the government does and when that happens it LIKELY goes FOR the unions because of the POWER they have over the DUES they get from the members every MONTH and their union tellS congress what they WANT.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Bonnie Hackett	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Audis C. Byrd	Rescind the 2014 Rule. About 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Ralph Ormsbee	go back to before 2014 when the communist took over the Federal Government	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Michelle Alvare	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Kevin Moody	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Tom Gilbrough	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Mark Rochen	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
DONALD RIDZ	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Margaret Lehman	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Robert Andrews	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
pacita Sy	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
CSM Terry B. Zimmerman	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Vernon L. Grose	Favor abolishment of unions for Federal employees	No Attachments	2018-04-12
dana williams	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Bob Flath	Please rescind the 2014 election rule and protect workers from forced unionization	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Ronnie Head	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Mike Petrovich	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Ann	Nobody should have to pay any price to have a job. We're there to make money, not have it taken away.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
John D. Ellsworth	Recend the 2014 rule! No one should be forced to join a union they do not support, and then have large dues taken out of their pay check.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Martha Chappell	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Cary Cook	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Pat Owen	Rescind the 2014 rule regarding forced unionization for a public employee. This employee should have the right to opt out of the union involved.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Michael K. Kimm	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Roger Callahan	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Lana Callahan	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re-certify majority support & by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Matt Bjork	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Louis Hodges	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Hillel Yampol	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
James Richards	The 2014 Rules were adopted to consolidate political power, not improve employment conditions. Please overturn them. Adopt rules that represent the unionization desires and interests of the work force, not political groups.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Kenneth Johnston	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Arthur Rubin	Rescind the 2014 rule. Ensure that any union certified without an election have an election scheduled; the union being decertified unless the election succeeds. Allow workers as much access to send comments to the workers as any union has.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Byron Hamm	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Charles Gates	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Anonymous Too	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Al Closson	Rescind the 2014 Rule! Since 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support AND eliminate all hindrances to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
D. Smith	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Jeffrey Simon	Rescind the 2014 Rule. 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union. No unionization without representation! Protect workers from forced unionization, require unions to regularly recertify and eliminate bars to decertification. elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Jon Gorham	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Anonymous	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Paul Papanestor	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Charlie Martin	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Irene Smith	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Bruce Gerlinger	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Lawrence A Lobdell Jr	Rescind the 2014 Rule. About 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, so protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Wayne Charlton	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Robert Tway	The 2014 Election rule should be rescinded. Go back to the regs we had before Obama.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
John Purcell	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Emma M Gifford	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
james baker	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Kevin Yeager	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Paul Billings	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Larry A Sullivan	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Robin Wagner	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re-certify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
LOUIE CASEY	The 2014 Election Rule should be rescinded. You need to protect all workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
John and Lynn Buckler	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Marie Dennings	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly certify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Al	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Robert S Burckes	Rescind the 2014 Election Rule. As 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, require unions to regularly recertify majority support, and eliminate all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Roberta Hosler	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Henry O Hodge Jr	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re-certify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Bruce Powell	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Marilyn Blair	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Many of us choose not to be in unions and should not have to support them.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Raymond Hudson	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Tom Adams	Please allow workers to decide if they want to join a union or not. A worker should have the right to opt out and not be forced to support a union they don't support.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Michael Havlovic	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
David M. Sigurdson	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Mark Pachuta	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Anonymous	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Frank Dill	Forced union dues for noon union workers Was another step toward socialism then communism.More freedom gone.Under Obama The NLRB was a collective Kim him un.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
J	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Stuart Anthony	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re certify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
James Pogue	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Jeff Capco	I agree that the left wing Democratic party has overstepped their authority and they are power grabbing by allowing the Unions too much power to help push their agenda.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Van Snyder	Do not force workers to join a union with which they disagree. Require unions to recertify majority support regularly. Eliminate all bars to recertification elections. Do not force employers to divulge employee contact information.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
David Watson	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Norman Hughes	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Alan Garner	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Christopher F Gandy	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Tom Padwa	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Doug R. Meyers	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Dennis Krug	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Michael Lewis	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification election	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Claudia W. Clark	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
ALICE MARIE BOUDREAU	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Harold Tucker	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
J. Jeffrey Williams, Esq.	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
James W Edwards	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Dave Schmidt	Rescind current Obama regs. Management and Labor should have a level playing field. Not one biased in favor of one side.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Cheryl	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
David Russell	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Michael.harris	Autos are built in unionized plants. New cars cost more than the houses most people live in. I am a Republican Patriot, Freedom for all. Unions are socialistic.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
William Bourbonnais	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
James J Vos	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re-certify majority support and by eliminating all bars to de-certification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Roger Grosssel, PhD	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Linda Theiss	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Alvin L. Barden	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Marva Heier	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Richard Ehrman	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Charles W. Schreiber	Please rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re-certify majority support and by eliminating all bars to desertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Tim A. Meinschein	1 & 2) Yes, the 2014 Ruling should NOT Allow Harassment Online, and Harassment AT Someone's HOME should be PROHIBITTED!!! 3) No one should be allowed to Swoop in without a chance for a Fair Debate of the Issues!	No Attachments	2018-04-12
David A. Bego	Rescind! Read The Devil at Our Doorstep which exposes Obama's ties to the SEIU and Card Check. Also read these blogs: https://devilatmydoorstep.wordpress.com/2015/02/10/reprise-beware-the-ambush/ and	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Jack D. Kendall	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re-certify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Marianne Blawn	get rid of the unions	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Kenneth Chase	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to desertification elections	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Edward Reinhart	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Jacob Kaiser	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Bob Houser	Keep the rule. The time line gives workers the right to join a union with less time for fear and intimidation.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Karl Buesching	The rules are extremely lopsided and make it exceedingly difficult to have a reasonable debate. The 2014 rules should be scrapped and a impartial set should be created the doesn't favor any side.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
David Caseey	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Terry A. Jones	RECIND the 2014 rule! NO forced unionization and no forced union dues from non union employees!	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Scott Ward	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
vernon C. Bullers	I believe the 2014 rule should be rescinded	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Yoon-Hee Ewald	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Labor Unions have a horrible track record in supporting and defending their members. Forced union membership is no solution. Unions cause many problems and are full of corruption. Stop the unions.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
RE Bynon	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Noah Long	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Richard Boissonneault	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Robert A Houser	Please see the attached letter.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Edwin Johnson	Drain e swamp	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Karolyn	Stop forced union membership. Let people freely choose where their money goes. This is suppose to be a free world and it is their money they worked for. So let them choose.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Larry L. Tillick	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Kevin Ewald	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Jan Williams	Please rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
ken Heller	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Scott Jones	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Kenneth Ervin	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Patricia Sims	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Bob Johnson	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further,as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Edward Collins	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re-certify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Teri Rudnick	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Gary Moore	escind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification election	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Bruce Thompson	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Pete Reinhold	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Katherine A. Gedden	Rescind the 2014 Rule.Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Robert Firebaugh	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Anonymous	I think people that work should be careful on the job too many people getting hurt or even killed on the job & them 7 their families have to suffer because of it	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Jean-Marie Rowe	Rescind the 2014 Rule. As 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union. Require unions to regularly recertify majority support and eliminate all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Ralph Kneale	No worker should be required to pay Union dues!	No Attachments	2018-04-12
james Boyd	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
don richards	Congress should pass a law requiring the unions to get new authorization periodically (every 3-5 years) from the work force.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Oliver Aldrich, III	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re-certify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Barry Williams	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Patrick Buckley	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Tom Mattus	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Larry Keller	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
David Sulko	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Bernice Wall	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Hjepstein@yahoo.com	Unions have outlived their usefulness and purpose. Americans should have a right to work without being forced to support a union or their political self serving positions and lobbying	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Pat Nutz	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Jim Huckabee	each Employer & employee should be able to chose for themselves to belong to Union Or Not.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Gary Lightfoot.	Make Labor Unions Illegal	No Attachments	2018-04-12
John Hicks	There is no reasonable reason why I make less and have fewer benefits under the union contract. The union negotiated like the Dems. crappy.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Hector Haddock	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Stella Craven	Everyone should have the choice to join a union or not join a union as he or she wishes. They should not be harassed to do something they do not wish to do. Union strikes should not keep people from working to support their families.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Thomas A. Jordan	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Donald Stiegler	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
James Anderson	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Luis E Acosta	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Joe Mims	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
L.Frank Lipsey	2014 Election rule should be rescinded.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Charles Arnold	Repeal the Obama labor union illegal vote pact.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Anonymous	Rescind the 2014 Election Rule as the platform of the Unions is communistic in nature and benefits only the top dogs and they just give the union members just an appeasement token of what the ones in charge get.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Jeff Pace	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Arthur Hicks	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
David Lyons	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
VICTOR SENESE	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Aaron Smith	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Ray E. Kornbau	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further as 94 percent of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Judy Westmmiller	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re certify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Garth Wilson	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization, by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Richard Firth	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Keith Lauver	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Mark Shear	Rescind the 2014 Rule. As 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization, require unions to recertify majority support periodically and eliminate barriers to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Diana Gries	DO NOT ALLOW UNIONS TO REQUIRE EMPLOYEES TO BELONG TO THEM.Rescind the 2014 Rule, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Anonymous	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Werner Lippe	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Robert Reinhold	I am strongly opposed to required union membership or dues.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Keith Kelley Jr	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Mary Jo Lunsford	We must protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and eliminating all bars to decertifications. Rescind the 2014 rule.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Thomas Stilwell	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Sandra Wilson	Repeal the 2014 Election rule.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Baptiste Dejean, Jr.	Rescind the 2014 Rule.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Harley Westfall	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
David Scovel	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Leon J Panko	Rescind the 2014 Rule. The Unions have had the good life for too long under the previous administration. It s time to give some attention to the employees. Too much of the union dues are corrupting elections. This needs to stop.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Irwin C. Gemlich	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Anonymous	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
John Cooke	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Timothy Fife	No individual should be forced to be a member of any union nor should they have to pay dues unless it voluntary.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
James Gadberry	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Paul Petach	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Wallace E couch	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re-certify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Arthur Burr	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Rev. Dr. Ronald L. Sims	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Gary Burns	I was a dues paying Union Member while working for the Federal Government. I did not have to be as the US Government is a right to work environment. I do not want Unions to be able to force their way in and then steel the voice from the workers.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Stephen Russell	Make elections Open & have Neutral parties manage elections, NO Unions. Maybe a business or industries Consumers can. CUT waste & fraud in NLRB alone. Update elections Post results online.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Joe Davidson	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Brian J. Zink	I'm writing as a former union member to urge you to rescind the 2014 Election Rule.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Nancy Marlett	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Sarah Woodring	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Charles Holliday	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
chris falino	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Ken Copp	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re-certify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Charles Kusler	They just need to outlaw all unions.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Leon J Panko	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Otto Lamsfuss	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re-certify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Alex Czarniecki	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Bob LaDuke	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Mike Shannon	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re-certify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Gary Conley	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Adam Julius	Rescind the 2014 rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Faye M Barton	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Dave Hansen	Please rescind the 2014 Rule. Also, protect future workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly re-certify majority support, AND by eliminating all impediments to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Phillip Cunningham	It's time to take away the union advantages over businesses when it comes to organizing. If the worker's truly want the union, subterfuge and false advertising aren't required. Please institute new union election rules that are fair to both sides.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Allen D Gibson	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
David Yeoman	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
B.James	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Anonymous	Rescind the 2014 Rule. Further, as 94% of workers have not voted for the incumbent union, protect workers from forced unionization by requiring unions to regularly recertify majority support and by eliminating all bars to decertification elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Voltaire Cortez	Keep the 2014 Election Rule exactly as it is. Y'all should be helping working people join Unions, not to make it harder.	No Attachments	2018-04-12
William C Robinson	leave the 2014 Election rule as is,no changes needed	No Attachments	2018-04-12
Scott joel	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-11
Sharon Moynihan	The 2014 Election Rule be retained without change	No Attachments	2018-04-11
Cody Mecham	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-11
Michael Foster	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-11
IAM union steward Bill Gunlock	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-11
Frank Prochaska	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. The rule reduced the amount of unnecessary delay in the election process. The existing rule has successfully reduced time and administrative burden from this process and should be retained.	No Attachments	2018-04-10
Brian Townsend	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-10
Karla Walter	See attached document	No Attachments	2018-04-10
Paul Schubert	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-10
Kirk Nordberg	Election regulations should be retained in there present form.	No Attachments	2018-04-10
Doug Fox	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change!!!	No Attachments	2018-04-10
Paul Port	Don’t change nothing	No Attachments	2018-04-10
YVETTE DE LA CRUZ	Retain the 2014 Election Rule be retained without change. The 2014 Election Rule provides working people to exercise their rights in a timely manner without undue interference. Protect our freedom to exercise our rights - retain without change.	No Attachments	2018-04-10
Denise Strike	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these ruls, there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-10
Kelly Kirkland	This rule is a good example of a change that has reduced unnecessary delays in government process. I feel strongly it should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-04-09
Franklin Moss	The current rules are far superior to the prior practices. They lead to efficiency and fairness. They should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-04-09
Harris Schwartzreich	Please retain the 2014 election rule without change so that workers have the right to a timely union vote.	No Attachments	2018-04-09
William Funari	The 2014 election rule should be retained without change. It was a majir imorivement.	No Attachments	2018-04-09
Ziadee Cambier	Please retain the 2014 Election Rule without change.	No Attachments	2018-04-09
Allan Foster	Retain rules without modification.	No Attachments	2018-04-09
Brandon Bray	Keep the rule. Working people need their voices heard, and the ability to form a union is a right.	No Attachments	2018-04-09
Debbie Donnell	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-09
Tommy Barrett	Keep the rules the same.. In the 2014 election	No Attachments	2018-04-09
Tommy Barrett	Keep the rules the same.. IAM a Stewart of 751...	No Attachments	2018-04-09
Anonymous	the NLRB that the 2014 Election Rule be retained without change	No Attachments	2018-04-08
Barbara Fristoe	I urge the NLRB to retain the 2014 Election Rule without changes. This rule has been in effect for over three years and allows employees to vote on unionization without delays that employers try to use to decrease the effectiveness of unions.	No Attachments	2018-04-08
Elizabeth	I'm writing as an educator and union member to urge you to keep the current rules in place with no changes. They have been working well, so do not rescind the 2014 Election Rule.	No Attachments	2018-04-08
Betsy WEILL	After considering this, I would ask you to retain the bill as it is, allowing the union the time it needs to gather votes after a petition a=has been submitted. Please do not alter this previous regulation.	No Attachments	2018-04-08
James Y.	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-08
Anonymous	The 2014 Election Rule should not be rescinded. The NLRA is supposed to protect employees’ right to freely vote. If any changes are made, it should be to make it easier for employees to vote without delay, obstacles, or employer interference.	No Attachments	2018-04-08
Katherine Galagan	The 2014 election rule should be retained without modifications. It is working well.	No Attachments	2018-04-08
James L Blessing	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-08
Carolyn Akinbami	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. This rule reduces malicious delay when workers petition for an election to vote on forming a union at work. The rule works, helping to ensure workers a right to vote.	No Attachments	2018-04-08
Joe Goldberg	Please retain the 2014 Election Rule without change.	No Attachments	2018-04-08
Joe Freia	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-08
Gary Swartz	The rules have always worked well and no need to change them!	No Attachments	2018-04-07
Jeff Garvin	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-07
Andy Morrison	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-06
Dianne newhall	Don’t change anything	No Attachments	2018-04-06
Matt palicte	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-06
Merle Fowler	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-06
Glenn Snyder	Do not revoke or change the amendments.	No Attachments	2018-04-06
Anonymous	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change	No Attachments	2018-04-06
Chris Powers	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-06
Chris mirante	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-06
Mark Hartman	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-06
Becky G Beasley	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-06
Gary D. Johnson	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Anonymous	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
John S Gregory	Retain 2014 rule	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Alivia Taing	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
earl gressett	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
R. J. Bachmeier	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
R. Espiritu	1. YES, RETAIN WITHOUT CHANGE to the 2014 Election Rule. 2. NO, to retain with modifications. 3. NO, to rescind.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
crisanto dofredo	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
David Hamre	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Michael Coy Hill Jr	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change? It should be in place for several years in order to properly assess pros and cons.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Gary Naple	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Lisa McCrossen	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Lloyd James Wilson	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Robert Stern	The changes that were made three years ago are common sense changes to stop undue delays for workers seeking representation. These rules should not be altered.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Justin Tzuanos	Retained without change. The NLRA is supposed to protect employees’ right to freely vote in a union election. If any changes are made, it should be to make it easier for employees to vote without delay, obstacles, or employer interference.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Emmanuel Cruz	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Jonah Nelson	The 2014 Election Rule should not be rescinded. If any changes are made to the rule, it should be to make it easier for employees to vote without delay, obstacles, or employer interference	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Whitney Fleshman	The Rule should not be rescinded. The NLRA is supposed to protect employees’ right to freely vote in a union election. If any changes are made, it should be to make it easier for employees to vote without delay, obstacles, or employer interference.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Suzanne Summerlin	The Rule should not be rescinded. The NLRA is supposed to protect employees’ right to freely vote in a union election. If any changes are made, it should be to make it easier for employees to vote without delay, obstacles, or employer interference	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Brent Garren	I have been involved in dozens of NLRB elections. The current rules eliminate hearings that serve no purpose, minimize litigation over unnecessary issues and make the process far more predictable. Please do not weaken them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Don Yetter	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Michele Hale	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Anonymous	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Eric Wickenheiser	For fair organizing keep 2014 rules in place.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Anna C Wetmore	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Robert Prout	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Vitaliy. A. Khromets	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Gregory Grundl	The 2014 Election rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Carolyn Romeo	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Gregory a Lether	Leave the 2014 labor/union rules the same. Let people make their own choice in a short amount of time, does no good to extend the time out.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Monty Patterson	THE 2014 ELECTION RULE MUST BE RETAINED. The NLRB should make it easier for workers to organize.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Scott Schafer	Retain the rules without change.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Lee Verfaillie	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Darrin Waters	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
michael burleson	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Jason P. Chan	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Charles Hays	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Mike Chaney	Retain the 2014 ruling	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Janusz Bochniarz	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Paul Joseph Dizon	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
J Post	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Jerry Hoover	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Robyn Scott	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Jerry Schrift	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
Samedi Kean	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-05
William Olson	Please retain the current rules WITHOUT change. I am a union member since 1973 and life with fair pay and benefits. My kids and grandkids deserve a speedy process if they choose union. Don't give companies more time to brow beat them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Clayton e. Spah jr	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Roy H Wilkinson	Leave the rules as they are. The vote will determine the outcome so, let it be done quickly. Thank you, Roy	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Helge Ronhovde	Retain the current 2014 election rule without any changes	No Attachments	2018-04-04
R D Holly	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Karen Racowsky	Keep the 2014 rules in tact without any changes.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Jon Voss	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
richard holman	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Dale C Conklin	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Doran Reano	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Dwight Rousu	retained without changes. Economic inequality is a major problem in our country as well as in the rest of the world. Unions help resist economic inequality. Forming and keeping unions should be made as easy and quick as possible.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Patric L Boone	American laborers are in danger of being reduced to poverty level. Collective bargaining is a basic tool for workers to stand up to corporate greed. We need to have a voice against attacks on our financial well-being.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Daniel Swank	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Jonathan Ross	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Edward J. Motter	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Donn W. Vey	Please Keep the 2014 rules intact! No changes!!	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Charles Jhong	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Andrew J Peltola	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Russell C Gourlie	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Gary Weiss	Retain the 2014 Election Rule without change!	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Jason Szymanski	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Richard M. Green	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Rhonda Judy Morrison	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Kevin Vazquez	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
David wyatt	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Rosalinda Agurre	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Victoria Neumeier	Please keep the rules in place to streamline Union elections. Anything that delays an election means workplace instability as frustrated workers leave out of frustration. This is especially true in low wage, fast turnover jobs.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Steve Warren	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
John McCurley	If it is for the good of the people, why change it?	No Attachments	2018-04-04
E.A. Fortson	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Morgan Neill	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Luizane Chiv	Please keep the 2014 rule elections remain the same. Thank You	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Timothy O'Hara	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Travis Jones	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Kevin Currie	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Michael Schmale	let all Unionize as to excersise each employee right to collective bargaining, free from Management harrassment, intimidation.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Karen McLean	Retain the 2014 Election Rule - no modifications. I appreciate the opportunity to have a voice in the process.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Thorn Prom	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Jeff Ament	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Ron Jochim	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Kent christian	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Karen Wakita	#1 Keep the 2014 contract language as it is	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Jay Herzmark	Keep the rule-Ers always seek delay and it's advantage-Ees need unions-Balance of power to far from ees & unions-Re-balance the scales-No more delays for representation elections!	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Christopher Navarro	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Dale E Peer	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Jesse Rodriguez	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Ed Lutgen	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Connie Kelliher	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without ANY changes. The current rule for forming a union is working and reduces unnecessary delays that deprive workers of their rights. The courts have upheld these rules; there is no reason to change them.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Judy Mogan	Corporations have everything on their side to fight union organization. The small change of shortening the ability for people to organize is not unreasonable. I request that these rules stay in place and stop Making it harder to organize	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Brett Schock	The 2014 election rule should be retained without changes	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Larry Hunter	Th2 2014 election rule should be modified to make the election even quicker, say 7 - 14 days.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Bill Spring	Please keep the rules as they are currently. They provide a fair and equitable balance for the process.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Sheri Johnson	KEEP THE RULES!!!	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Caleb Reese	Please keep the existing rules, no reason to change them. Thank you!	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Sean Barnett	The middle-class need unions and everything should be done to Keep union strong rather than destroy them	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Allen Eveland	I believe that the rules should be unchanged or modified in any way. The employees should have the right to a speedy and fair due process. In Canada they only allow 7 days before an election.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Brent McFarlane	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained. Please keep the rule in its present form.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Dorothy Gibson	Retain the rules without change.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Darrell Holzer	The 2014 Rule MUST be retained. America needs more, not fewer unions!	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Kristen Beifus	I encourage the NLRB to retain the 2014 election rule without change. Workers interested in forming a union at their workplaces should have the right to a clear, concise process that enables them a timely vote.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Jennifer Garner	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. Employees are better able to make a free choice, while employers have not been disadvantaged. Please keep the rule in its present form.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Mimi Satter	The 2014 rules brought the NLRB into the 21st century, are fair and balanced. They expedited elections, reduced pointless litigation and kept the costs reasonable for the Agency and parties. I urge they be retained in their present form.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
frank hoskins	Leave the rules as they are.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Sarah E. Ruhlen, Esq.	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. The rule reduces litigation, eases the process for non-represented parties, and has not affected Employers' ability to campaign on their own behalf. The rule makes the election process fairer.	No Attachments	2018-04-04
jeff	I just would like to say. Make it easier for communication between the public to its administration officials	No Attachments	2018-04-04
Samuel Talbot	I believe it is very important to retain the 2014 election rule. Employees need to be able to access their rights to organize. The 2014 rule change has meant that for the first time I and my co-workers can expect to participate in NLRB elections.	No Attachments	2018-04-03
Russ Brown	https://morningconsult.com/opinions/nlrb-ambush-elections-are-un-american/ We are submitting the above op-ed as our comments.	No Attachments	2018-04-03
Jeremy Meyer	The Rule should be retained without change. The rule streamlines the election process which is ultimately better for everyone. The fear that it would favor unions has not been borne out by NLRB election statistics since the rules went into effect.	No Attachments	2018-04-03
Walter Biggs	This rule should be rescinded because it does not give employers enough time to react.	No Attachments	2018-04-03
Sarah McKenney	Do not change the current procedures. My union was the first to form using these new rules and have much benefited from it. If not for these procedures being in place, we would never have gotten to the bargaining table.	No Attachments	2018-04-03
Eric Steven Griesel	The current speedy format is disastrous in its brevity. The Regional Director has the authority to disregard time extensions agreed to by the parties, and to what end? Get rid of the curren format and return to the former procedure.	No Attachments	2018-04-02
S. Roark	The 2014 Election Rule be retained without change. This is an attack on the American Dream. They want us to pay all the taxes and make as little money as possible.	No Attachments	2018-04-02
Germaal Richardson	To view all submissions	No Attachments	2018-04-01
Brendan Sullivan	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without any changes.	No Attachments	2018-03-31
Ross McDonagh	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without changes as it has not only saved the American taxpayers countless tax dollars, but it has also assisted in the furtherance of the aims of the NLRA to encourage collective bargaining.	No Attachments	2018-03-31
Jared Odessky	The amendments from December 2014 streamline the union representation election process and reduce needless litigation. The NLRB should leave the amendments intact.	No Attachments	2018-03-30
Carolyn melvin	Yes	No Attachments	2018-03-28
Tyler Scheidt	2014 Election Rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-03-28
Mario Vega	The amendments to the procedures adopted in 2014 have improved the process. They have not given an advantage to either side. Rather, made the process more efficient, more transparent. Our union asks the Board not to revoke or change the amendments.	No Attachments	2018-03-28
Mario Vega	The new rules have made the process more easily understood by employees.	No Attachments	2018-03-28
Carl shinkle	Number 1 leave alone without change to 2014 rule	No Attachments	2018-03-27
C. Butler	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-03-25
Jim Conaghan #134	#3 Rescind the 2014 Electoin Rule	No Attachments	2018-03-23
Joshua Heuertz	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. The new rules allow employees who want to vote in an election to do so soon after they file a petition with the NLRB, without an extended delay. That is what employees want.	No Attachments	2018-03-22
Alfonso N. Lopez SMART Local 88 Organizer	I also request that the 2014 election rule remain as is.	No Attachments	2018-03-21
Manuel Gonzalez	Please see attached letter.	No Attachments	2018-03-21
Michael Hogan	The amendments are simple, reduce the need for lawsuits, and strike a good balance between the democratic rights of workers and the right for employers to advocate on their own behalf. The change or elimination is unnecessary.	No Attachments	2018-03-21
Rick Becker	The amendments to the procedures adopted in December 2014 represent modest and common-sense changes in the processing of petitions for an election.I urge the Board not to alter the amendments..	No Attachments	2018-03-21
Geisinger Health	Geisinger submits and supports rescinding the 2014 Election Rule and requiring the Board to revert to the election regulations that were in effect prior to the 2014 Election Rule’s adoption. See attached.	No Attachments	2018-03-21
Greg Suydam	2014 Election Rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-03-20
rob mcbeth	The 2014 election rule should be rescinded. I believe that the prior rule is fair to bot the workers and companies alike and it should be returned to the rules in place prior to 2014.	No Attachments	2018-03-20
Amanda Sager	The current rules do not give an advantage to unions or pro-union employees. Before our election, the employer was able to reach all employees with its messages.	No Attachments	2018-03-19
Devin Leingang	I ask that the board leave the election rule the way it is. If it's not Broken don't fix it.	No Attachments	2018-03-19
Kal Rohde	I do not see a need to change the process that is in place now. I do not see a problem for either side on keeping what is in place. So why our we changing something that is not broken?	No Attachments	2018-03-19
Paulie Williams	I think the NLRB should leave the rules the same. I believe the process is the fairest yet. Business owners already can sit their employees down during work time as long as they want.	No Attachments	2018-03-19
Joshua W. Diemart	I believe the 2014 Election Rule should remain unchanged. From things I have read, employees have appreciated the quicker elections. Are they not the voices that should carry the most weight?	No Attachments	2018-03-19
Scott Davis	These rules don’t give any advantage to union or the companies.	No Attachments	2018-03-19
Shane Guyer	They have not given an advantage to either employers or unions.Our union asks the Board not to revoke or change the amendments	No Attachments	2018-03-19
Brad M	Leave the rules as-is. Companies like AUTONATION simply use the excess time to threaten and fire union supporters before the election can take place.	No Attachments	2018-03-18
Kim vaughn	Do not change the rules at this time.	No Attachments	2018-03-17
Daniel J. Chacon Sr.	2014 Election Rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-03-16
Ivan Meyen	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-03-16
David R. Heath	CAPTCHA	No Attachments	2018-03-16
Brian Noble	I would like to see the procedures remain!!	No Attachments	2018-03-16
Aaron R. Bailey	I ask the Board not to revoke or change the amendments.	No Attachments	2018-03-16
Dave Sylvester	Why would we change the rules now? When what’s in place already has been working.	No Attachments	2018-03-16
Carl Cacioppo-Director of Market Development SMART	RFI answers re: 2014 Election Rule 1. Yes 2. No 3. No	No Attachments	2018-03-16
Leroy Smith	The rule should be retained without modifications. The NLRB is meant to sustain fair bargaining. Changing the rule will make employees for susceptible to anti-union lawyers.	No Attachments	2018-03-16
John Curtin	I do not believe the Board should change these procedures. The new rules have made the process more easily understood by employees.	No Attachments	2018-03-16
Donna Memmer	Request to keep the 2014 Election Rule in tact with no changes.	No Attachments	2018-03-16
Trish Cook	Please revert to the old time line to allow employers time to respond! No on like to be surprised, and this is just what this short time line does!	No Attachments	2018-03-15
Mark Smith	The rule needs to go back to the way it was to allow management time to respond! Need to be fair to all parties, not just unions.	No Attachments	2018-03-15
Cliff Sanderson	I am a veteran human resource executive and strongly believe that the shortened election window will harm employee relations. This is shortened cycle time is a thinly veiled attempt to bolster the ranks of dues paying union members.	No Attachments	2018-03-15
Jacob Shipman	The amendments to the procedures adopted in December 2014 have improved the process. Our union asks the Board not to revoke or change the amendments.	No Attachments	2018-03-14
Jesse Buell	see attached	No Attachments	2018-03-14
Philip	I have seen firsthand the benefits of organizing. I urge the Board to retain the 2014 Election Rule without changes! The rule in question provides for an even playing field - a standard championed by most Americans.	No Attachments	2018-03-14
Anonymous	See attached.	No Attachments	2018-03-14
Chris Tveitbakk	I am an employee who recently participated in an election conducted by the NLRB. I do not believe the Board should change those procedures.	No Attachments	2018-03-14
Cynthia Sauter	The 2014 Election Rule should revert back. Shortening the time frame from petition to election denies an Employer their opportunity to wage an appropriate communication campaign designed to allow an Employee to make an educated choice.	No Attachments	2018-03-14
Toriano green	I received an letter for an settlement agreement with Anderson enterprises trying to see what i need to do please call me at9013036820	No Attachments	2018-03-13
Barry Tillis	Please keep NLRB elections as they currently are. The current procedure is fair to employees, the previous procedure was not , it allowed employers to coerce its workers to vote no but Union reps would not have the same opportunity.	No Attachments	2018-03-13
Roxanne Rosas	I recently observed an election that benefited from the current NLRB rules. Please don't change them. Thanks	No Attachments	2018-03-12
John Garretson	Attached is IBEW Local Union 304's comments regarding the election rules, we believe the rules currently level the playing field for each party. Thanks John L Garretson II Business Manager Financial Secretary IBEW Local Union 304	No Attachments	2018-03-12
Robert Snurpus	The rule should be retained, and modified, to allow unions to have captive audience meetings in the same room as the employer. At different times of course, maybe even alternating times.	No Attachments	2018-03-10
Arthur A Reihl	Sirs; Beginning in 2015, the NLRB updated its Election Rule, to streamline the election process and removed many of the barriers. The updated procedures serve employees well and are pro-worker. I do not believe these new rules should be changed.	No Attachments	2018-03-08
Joseph D weber	I have attached a pdf with my short response against the repeal. I am in favor of the current rules.	No Attachments	2018-03-08
Becky Braddock	the 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change	No Attachments	2018-03-07
Thomas L Phelps	You are not working for Donald Trump, you are supposed to be working for the working citizens of America. We have the right to organize and do not need any more infringements on that right.	No Attachments	2018-03-07
Anonymous	1. Yes, the 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. There is plenty of opportunity for the Employer to reach employees currently and to revert to the old Rule skews the opportunity to present all sides fairly.	No Attachments	2018-03-07
Blas Kisic	I’m familiar with NLRB elections. The new rules do not give unions an undue advantage. Our employer was not kept from sending all kinds of information. Now we can vote soon after filing a petition with the NLRB - it's exactly what we want.	No Attachments	2018-03-07
Forrest Brakeman	I feel very strongly that the NLRB and the Federal Government should take no action that inhibits the ability of, or makes it harder for, unions to organize non-union production facilities or productions.	No Attachments	2018-03-07
James Whitehorn	My comments are attached in the brief attachment	No Attachments	2018-03-07
Rosa Costanza	I write to provide information concerning my coworkers' and my experience under the Board's procedures. We do not believe the Board should change those procedures. The current rules do not give an advantage to unions or pro-union employees.	No Attachments	2018-03-07
George from California	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained with no change, because workers should have a chance to vote on keeping their collective voice. It makes no sense otherwise, unless you're a fearful and resentful employer.	No Attachments	2018-03-07
Matt	I am an employee who recently participated in an election conducted by the NLRB. My coworkers and I do not believe the Board should change those procedures.	No Attachments	2018-03-07
Don J Brinning	retain the 2014 rule without change	No Attachments	2018-03-07
Greg Reeves	Please see attached.	No Attachments	2018-03-07
Selyna Holland	9379773461 please contact me. I was wondering if they can give you a raise and then take it away.	No Attachments	2018-03-06
Carlos thomas	My union did not defend me.they didn't talk to my witness.they said a lack of evidence.they didn't try to help me at all.i got proof the president lied on me.the union showed no effort in my defense at all.	No Attachments	2018-03-02
Charmaine	Please and thank you do not change.	No Attachments	2018-02-28
Mitchell Smith	Needs to be retained as it is currently	No Attachments	2018-02-28
Anonymous	I Debra Works am requesting an appointment to file a case Please contact me at 626 3934827	No Attachments	2018-02-26
Steve Ongerth	Retain the 2014 election rule without change. Thank you.	No Attachments	2018-02-26
B MEYER	The 2014 rule regarding elections should be retained as it currently stands, and should remain unmodified.	No Attachments	2018-02-23
Kris Warner	Should the 2014 Election Rule be retained without change? Yes.	No Attachments	2018-02-23
Chris	Keep the rules the way they are.	No Attachments	2018-02-23
Kevin	Keep the rules the way they are. Improves fairness for workers to improve their workplace conditions without extensive backlash.	No Attachments	2018-02-23
brianna	Keep the rules the way they are	No Attachments	2018-02-22
Zach Bernard	The 2014 rule should stand.	No Attachments	2018-02-22
marcus	The rule absoluetely should remain unchanged.	No Attachments	2018-02-21
Stephanie Frizzell	Please keep the rules the way they are.	No Attachments	2018-02-21
Anonymous	Please keep the 2014 ruling the way it is.	No Attachments	2018-02-21
Noah Goldman	Please keep the 2014 ruling the way it is.	No Attachments	2018-02-21
Randall J	Keep the 2014 rule the same.	No Attachments	2018-02-21
Bradley D. Laird	Please do not change this rule. Labor is so weakened that it appears that this is more of the plutarchic dictatorial rule.	No Attachments	2018-02-21
Joe	Being able to do an election with only 10 days of union busting vs over a month makes a big difference. Please don't reverse it!	No Attachments	2018-02-21
Eli Naeher	Please retain the existing rule. There is no excuse for making this process slower and more costly.	No Attachments	2018-02-21
Anonymous	The 2014 rule regarding elections should be retained as it currently stands, and should remain unmodified.	No Attachments	2018-02-21
Dylan Brooks	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-02-21
Jacob Glicklich	Retain the 2014 rules, without changes. It's fairer, better, more honest.	No Attachments	2018-02-21
D. Tucker	Don't change the rules.	No Attachments	2018-02-21
Anthony Paladino	See Attached	No Attachments	2018-02-21
Roberta Yard	YES, the Rule should be rescinded. Called "ambush" for a reason, unfair to companies, employees. Should either revert to old rules, or change. Unions should have to come up for re-auth every 1 or 2 yrs.	No Attachments	2018-02-20
Michael Kerrigan	Please retain the 2014 election rule without modification.	No Attachments	2018-02-20
Paul Kelly	see attached	No Attachments	2018-02-20
Rodrigo Ramirez	2014 Election rules should change because I beleive that team members should have more time to consider their vote rather than rushed into a vote.	No Attachments	2018-02-19
Bafana Nyoni	Repeal/rescind these laws	No Attachments	2018-02-19
Fred Blan	I am speaking out against the current election rules because they are overly slanted towards unions and do not give voters the chance to cast a fully informed vote. Please see attached:	No Attachments	2018-02-19
Fred Blan	I am speaking out against the current election rules because they are overly slanted towards unions and do not give voters the chance to cast a fully informed vote. Please see attached:	No Attachments	2018-02-19
Zakee Roberts	see attached	No Attachments	2018-02-19
Jeff Singleton	See attached	No Attachments	2018-02-19
Jon Scoville	Current rules do not allow enough time for adequet information to be obtained before a vote is given. Privacy of personal information is allowed to be shared without permission rom the individual. Let's support individuals and not special interests.	No Attachments	2018-02-19
Anonymous	Current rules do not allow enough time for adequet information to be obtained before a vote is given. Privacy of personal information is allowed to be shared without permission rom the individual.	No Attachments	2018-02-19
Neil Pettit	Leave the election rules as is.	No Attachments	2018-02-19
James n smith	Please leave the rules as they are.	No Attachments	2018-02-17
Meredith Abrams	1. The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. 2. N/A 3. N/A	No Attachments	2018-02-16
Andrew H. Baker	Responsive memorandum is attached.	No Attachments	2018-02-16
Daniel J Kortte	SEE ATTACHED	No Attachments	2018-02-15
Richard F.	Please keep the 2014 Election Rule the same as it has been since the ruling.	No Attachments	2018-02-14
Karsten Syversen	The 2014 election rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-02-13
Edgardo Villanueva - EMSI LLC	Rescind the 2014 ruling! I testified before the NLRB in 2014 how UNFAIR it is that Voters not have enough time to learn about a very complex process that impacts their workplace and their Pocketbooks. Give them enough time to make an educated vote!	No Attachments	2018-02-13
James K. Edwards	I've received no compensation due to a work related injury back in 2014 employment was terminated unjustly still receiving treatment still seeking help	No Attachments	2018-02-13
Michael B. Plummer	Leave election rules as they are currently.	No Attachments	2018-02-12
Michael B. Plummer	Leave election rules as they are currently.	No Attachments	2018-02-12
Michael B. Plummer	Leave election rules as they are currently.	No Attachments	2018-02-12
Mark A Johnson	The Election Rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-02-12
Dominic jovanovich	Please keep the rules as it is now. 10 days to hold a union election.	No Attachments	2018-02-12
Phil Reichel	Please retain the 10-21 day rule as it exists currently. Shortening the time could adversely affect elections. thanks.	No Attachments	2018-02-12
Neal Kosaly-Meyer	Please retain the 10-21 day rule as it exists currently. Thanks.	No Attachments	2018-02-12
Jason	see attached	No Attachments	2018-02-12
John Mancini	The election rules should remain as they are. A speedy and due process ensures fairness.	No Attachments	2018-02-12
Chad Teixeira	The 2014 ruling should be left alone. Please make no changes as this would be detrimental to workers rights.	No Attachments	2018-02-12
john taylor	I urge the NLRB to repeal the current election rules. NLRB should be ensuring fairness or all involved. Thank you	No Attachments	2018-02-12
Carl Pina III	Keep the 2014 ruling with no change as it streamlines the election process. The General Council wants to streamline the board. Here is something he can leave alone that can help save money for all tax payers.	No Attachments	2018-02-11
john puljic	Please leave the election rules as they are today. Thank you	No Attachments	2018-02-11
Eric Lambert	Do not change the 2014 rule	No Attachments	2018-02-11
Kyle McCoy	No changes for now. Let's see how the Rules work for a few more years and reevaluate if necessary. Thanks.	No Attachments	2018-02-11
Kenneth Kuntzman	I’m an Illinois resident, I’m hopeful that the 2014 Election Rule will be retained without change. Thank you.	No Attachments	2018-02-11
Michael Brown	Need reparation for hours worked and didn't get paid for because boss messed with clock rings	No Attachments	2018-02-11
Jose Cruz	Please leave election regulations as they are. Thank You	No Attachments	2018-02-10
Marian Novak	Retain without change.	No Attachments	2018-02-10
Kimberly Catuara	Leave the rules as is	No Attachments	2018-02-09
Corinne Espinoza	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-02-09
TARA ESPINOZA	No. Just absolute no. You cannot pass a law that makes it easier for employers to steal hard earned money. Employees that work for tips work harder than anyone! How dare someone think it would be okay to steal from them.	No Attachments	2018-02-08
Emmanuel Espinoza	I strongly oppose any changes to the NLRB rules. And this particular change is particularly appalling! We aren't stupid. We can all see that Acosta is only there to destroy the Labor Dept., much the same as the rest of Trump's cabinet.	No Attachments	2018-02-08
Patrick Nolan	Please leave the election rules as they are	No Attachments	2018-02-08
Mario Martinez	See attachment.	No Attachments	2018-02-08
Mario Martinez	See attachment.	No Attachments	2018-02-08
Jordan Fry	Please leave the 2014 election for representation rule unchanged. The entire purpose of the NLRB in 1933-35 was to protect employee rights and to level the playing field with employers. It is fair to all. Do not push workers back to the 1870's.	No Attachments	2018-02-08
Arthur Hill	Please leave the 2014 election for representation rule unchanged. The entire purpose of the NLRB in 1933-35 was to protect employee rights and to level the playing field with employers. It is fair to all. Do not push workers back to the 1870's.	No Attachments	2018-02-08
Craig Peck	Please leave the 2014 election rules in place.	No Attachments	2018-02-08
Jack A Carlson	Please leave the 2014 election for representation rule unchanged. The entire purpose of the NLRB in 1933-35 was to protect employee rights and to level the playing field with employers. It is fair to all. Do not push workers back to the 1870's	No Attachments	2018-02-08
Scott Parker	Please leave the 2014 election for representation rule unchanged. The entire purpose of the NLRB in 1933-35 was to protect employee rights and to level the playing field with employers. It is fair to all. Do not push workers back to the 1870's.	No Attachments	2018-02-08
Craig Stearns	The 2014 election rule should be retained without modifications	No Attachments	2018-02-08
State Representative Mike Sundin, Minnesota	Hands off! "Modifications" of any election rules by the current board reeks of partisanship influence focused on suppression of workers rights. Election FAIRNESS should never be a political football. Never deny democracy.	No Attachments	2018-02-08
Jeff Jewett	Leave election rules as are if anything speed the process up thank you	No Attachments	2018-02-08
Jeffrey Stark	There is no reason for change. The longer it takes to conduct an election the more time it gives an employer to intimidate the employees. Quick and simple!!!!	No Attachments	2018-02-08
John R. Kahrhoff	See attachment	No Attachments	2018-02-08
Cortez Coleman	I was wrongfully terminated from my job of 17 yrs. Accused of sexual harassment and a investigation was not done properly.	No Attachments	2018-02-08
Ronald Worley	I hope there are no changes to the 2014 election rules.	No Attachments	2018-02-08
Jeff Beck	Keep the 2014 election rules in place.	No Attachments	2018-02-07
Wesley Gunn	PLEASE keep the 2014 Regulations in place!	No Attachments	2018-02-07
Anonymous	Please leave the election regulations as they are. We need the right to an election that is not purposefully slowed down. Thank you	No Attachments	2018-02-07
Rita Kassak	Do not change the rules.	No Attachments	2018-02-07
Alexander Forester	Please leave the election rules as they are	No Attachments	2018-02-07
Anonymous	Do not change. Retain the 2014 election rule without change	No Attachments	2018-02-07
Ronald Hackett	Please leave the election rules as they are today. NO CHANGES.	No Attachments	2018-02-06
Sandra Stuart	Please leave the election rules as they are. no changes. The election process fine as it is!	No Attachments	2018-02-06
Jose Melendez	Please keep it the way it is.	No Attachments	2018-02-06
John Snay jr	Keep it the way it currently is	No Attachments	2018-02-06
Russ Hinde	please leave the election rules as they are. no changes	No Attachments	2018-02-06
Danielle Barajas	Leave the election process as it is!	No Attachments	2018-02-06
Michael A. La Barbera / IBEW L.U. 134	The Election Rules should be retained without changes!	No Attachments	2018-02-06
James Needham	I am speaking out against the current election rules because they are overly slanted towards unions and do not give voters the chance to cast a fully informed vote. Please see attached:	No Attachments	2018-02-06
Kenny Hayes	The process should stay the way it is.	No Attachments	2018-02-06
Nicholas Campbell	Leave the Election Rules as they are today! No changes!	No Attachments	2018-02-06
Margaret LaBombard - TWU Local 764, IATSE	Retain the 2014 Representation Rules with no changes	No Attachments	2018-02-06
Terry Lampson	Please leave the election rules as they currently are. I believe the current administration is attempting to slow the election process, we need quicker elections not slower. Thank you	No Attachments	2018-02-05
Rose Chatterton	Retain the 2014 Representation Rule as is. It's been good for Unions, for the Employer and the NLRB, too, because it saves time and money and works. Thank you.	No Attachments	2018-02-05
Betty Gunz	Leave the NLRB election rules alone.	No Attachments	2018-02-05
Brandon	Please see attached.	No Attachments	2018-02-05
Gary Otten	Please retain the current 2014 election rule and do not change the NLRB election process. It is fair the way it is. THank you.	No Attachments	2018-02-05
Michael Gradinjan	I believe the 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. It is a fair way to determine the desire of employees in regards to workplace rules and conditions.	No Attachments	2018-02-05
Ryan Schweizer	Leave the election process as it is!	No Attachments	2018-02-05
Thomas Boyd	Leave the election rules the same as they are today	No Attachments	2018-02-05
Stanley E. Ely	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change!	No Attachments	2018-02-04
Frank Gallagher	Retain the 2014 rule without changes	No Attachments	2018-02-04
John McKenna	Leave the election rules as they are today.	No Attachments	2018-02-04
Anonymous	Please leave the election rules as they are today.	No Attachments	2018-02-04
Janet Hershberger	Regarding the question "Should the 2014 Election Rule be retained without change, my response is a resounding YES.	No Attachments	2018-02-04
Leah Okin	Retain the 2014 Representation Rules with no changes.	No Attachments	2018-02-04
Martha L Smith	Retain the 2014 Representation Rules with no changes.	No Attachments	2018-02-04
David A Goodwin	Leave everything the same do not change it !!!	No Attachments	2018-02-04
Patricia A. White	Retain the 2014 Representation Rules with no changes.	No Attachments	2018-02-04
Abigayle	___123___Request For Information \| NLRBs___123___	No Attachments	2018-02-04
Christopher F	Please retain the 2014 election rules without any changes.	No Attachments	2018-02-04
Wally Stein	The rules should remain the same with no modifications.	No Attachments	2018-02-04
Andrew Springsteen	I respectfully request the election rules remain the same.	No Attachments	2018-02-04
Jim Johnson	Rescind the 2014 election rules. The previous rules worked well for years. Employees deserve to get all the facts before they vote.	No Attachments	2018-02-04
Adam	Please leave as is.	No Attachments	2018-02-03
Kathleen Slamka	Retain the 2014 Election Rules. I am not a Russian bot, I am an American worker. I have benefited from my ability to join with others at work to advocate for safe working conditions and a wage that supports my family.	No Attachments	2018-02-03
Terrence M Garland	Please leave this system and procedures as is.	No Attachments	2018-02-03
D Garstka	Leave rules as they are, do not make any changes.	No Attachments	2018-02-03
R. Leonatti	Retain the rules	No Attachments	2018-02-03
MARY JILL HANSON	the 2014 Election Rule should be retained without changes. These were only common sense rules, such as are in effect in other jurisdictions, for example, under the public employee law in Florida.	No Attachments	2018-02-03
Ron Wahl	the 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Anonymous	election rule should be retained WITHOUT change.	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Lorraine Seidel	Retain the rules.	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Lorraine Seidel	Retain the rules.	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Frank Lombardo	No change to election rule.	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Win Bernfeld	Retain the 2014 representation rules	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Barbara Crane	Retain the 2014 Representation Rules	No Attachments	2018-02-02
IATSE LOCAL 100	Retain the 2014 Representation Rules	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Gene Swartz	The 2014 Elections laws need to be entirely rescinded and we need to return to the former election rules, i.e., 42-Day Period. The current laws do not give the parties ample time to thoroughly discuss the pros/cons of unionization.	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Michael	The Election Rule should be retained without change(s).	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Kelly short	Leave the election process the way it is	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Anonymous	Leave the Election process as It is !!	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Terri Zell	Leave the election process as is!	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Nancy Akers	Leave the election process as it is!	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Robbie Tovar	leave the election rules as they are today to help your future we have the right to get a faster election	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Jason Cornett	Leave it as it is	No Attachments	2018-02-02
J lydon	Leave the election process the way it is,if it’s noy broken then don’t fix it.	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Jeremy Cromer	Leave the election process as it is!!!!	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Lisa Earls	Leave the election process as it is!	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Eric Tasa	Leave the process as it is.	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Joseph J Simmons	Please retain the existing election rules, with no changes.	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Cathy Hedden	Leave it as is	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Jim Loftis	Leave the election process as it is.	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Jon Scott	Leave them as they are now	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Lisa Fredette	Leave the election process as it is!	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Randy Thieme	Leave the election rules as they are today	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Mark Poole	Please leave the rules alone. It is the right of every citizen to join a union. AS it is, the rules almost even the playing field for workers. Thank You.	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Alton Cunningham	Everyone in this country deserves the right to a speedy trial, why is it different for workers? I believe the law should not be ratified and remain as is.	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Al Cunningham	The current process does not need to be change. Leave it the way it is. Thank you	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Dave Cleek	Please retain this rule without change.	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Bill rainey	Please leave as is stop destroying the middle class with these changes.	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Shawn Oster	Please leave the election rules as they are.	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Michael Barnes	The 2014 Election Rule should be be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-02-02
John Mackey	The rule should remain the same with no modifications.	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Derek Canen	1. Yes 2. No 3. No	No Attachments	2018-02-02
Brad M	Leave the rules as-is. Companies like AUTONATION don't need any additional delay time before the election to threaten and fire employees who excercise their legal right to organize. Ref. Case 12-CA-026126	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Steven Deutsch	See Attached	No Attachments	2018-02-01
william martin	leave the rules as they are	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Michael McNally	The 2014 Elections laws need to be entirely rescinded and we need to return to the former election rules, i.e., 42-Day Period. The current laws do not give the parties ample time to thoroughly discuss the pros/cons of unionization.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
John Buchholz	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Keith E. Klawien	Do not change the rules.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Thomas Coyne	Leave the election rules as they are today.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Anonymous	Do not change! Leave them as they are!	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Jim Woodson	Please leave the election rule as it is. Thank you for your consideration	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Kevin Harned	Please leave the election rules as they are currently written.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Roger E Hester	Leave the election process as it is!	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Dave	Leave things alone. Don't change things.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Keith W. Radtke	My response left out the word should "not" be tampered with. Thank you	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Keith W. Radtke	a member for 50 years and I find that the election rules have been good, and should be tampered with. Thank you	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Joy Scarlett	Retained without change!!	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Ricky J. Kueber	I firmly believe the current process and procedure should remain as it is currently.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
thomas woodby	keep the Election Rule without change THANK YOU....	No Attachments	2018-02-01
thomas woodby	keep the Election Rule without change THANK YOU....	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Union Corruption	I hope you take the time to read the well put together arguments of the people who are opposed to the current law. Most of the "leave it as it is" statements are generated by blast emails from the unions telling their members what to write.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Roger Hester	Please allow the Election Rule to remain the same!	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Adam Holmes	I want the election rules to remain the same. I believe all people should have the right to organize and join unions.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
James Rogosienski	Please leave the election rules as the currently exist.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Adam Gifford	The rule should stand as it is written.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Rich Lucks	Pleas leave the election rules as they are today to help workersto have the right to get a faster election	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Travis Cary	Leave election rule the same as it is today.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Anonymous	Please leave the law as it is. There is no need for change.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Ricardo sanchez	I vote to leave the regulation as they are. It is important that we have the opportunity for our workforce to be able to take their employers to a vote for fair wages and practices.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Dean A. Wanty	It's not broke don't fix it, leave as is now!	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Andrew T Buck	Please leave the election rules as they are today	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Michael Monday	Leave election rules as they are now.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Bonnie Mroczek	The new rules are very unfair to business and employees and don't provide appropriate time to communicates so employees can make an informed, no pressured,decision on what will best meet their needs. Revert back to the former pre-2014 rules.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Mark Kietzmann	Retain without change.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Don Athas	1) Yes, leave as it is 2)No, leave it as it is 3)No, leave it as it is	No Attachments	2018-02-01
John T. Zapfel	Please leave the election rules as they are today.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Kathy Zapfel	Please leave the election rules as they are today.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Ellen Collier	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Patrick C. Landgraf	Please leave the election rule as is. the new change brought about a quicker way of resolving elections that are fair for all parties involved. The law seems to be working just fine and should be left intact. thank you	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Steven P. Day	Please leave the election rules the way that they are.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Jeff Bussanich	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without any changes	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Patrick O'Gara	Election rules should remain the same without any changes	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Jim Collins	Leave the rules as they are now.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Christopher J Meyer	1) the election rule should be retained without changes	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Mike Hyatt	Leave the election rule as it stands	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Tim Dinauer	Retain with out change	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Steven H. Johnson	The 2014 rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Eugene I Golston	Refuse to bargain collectively with the representatives of his employees Employer does have to furnish a union upon request the names of witnesses to an incident for which an employee was disciplined requested and the legitimacy of defensive	No Attachments	2018-02-01
Keith Bordes	Retain without change.	No Attachments	2018-02-01
L Adamus	The Election Rule should be RETAINED without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Greg Budish	Retain without change	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Hibbler Darryl	Leave the election rules as they are today	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Chris Wenzel	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Douglas J Molinski	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Anonymous	Leave it all as it is.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Joseph Albarran	Please leave the election rules as they are today to help my future brothers and sisters have the right to get a faster election. The current administration is attacking Unions once more and trying to slow this process down.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Jeff Nehlsen	1. Should the 2014 Election Rule be retained without change? Yes, Please leave the election rules as they are.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Anonymous	1	No Attachments	2018-01-31
James Salm	Leave the system as is. It’s good as it is currently operating	No Attachments	2018-01-31
John Jacobs	To Whom it may concern. Please leave the election rules as they are today to help those who choose to have an election the right to do so in an efficient manner.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Jeff mehrhoff	The 2014 election rule should be retained with no changes or modifications.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Jeremy trasser	Leave they’re election rules the way they are.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Kevin D Walters	Leave election rules as they are today	No Attachments	2018-01-31
David Gamble	Yes,It helps people organize	No Attachments	2018-01-31
John Ansay	Leave the rules as they currently are.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Tom Grochowski	Can you please leave the election rules as they are today to help your future brothers and sisters have the right to get a faster election.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
KENNETH R MUSOLF	Leave the existing rules as is!	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Shane C Geres	retained without change	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Milan	Leave the rule as is	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Scott Helgemoe	Leave them the way they are	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Mark Maikowski	I would respectfully like to submit that I feel the 2014 election rule be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Dennis Hoffmann	Election rules should be retained without change!	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Keith Kirchhoff	Please retain the 2014 Election Rule without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Anonymous	Rescind rules and revert back to the way they were.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
David McCoy	Leave the rule as is	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Joshua Merrell	Leave it the same.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Marilyn Purdy	Leave the election rules as they are today!!!	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Jeremy Thurk	Leave it the way it is.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Kevin Brock	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
William Mitchell	Please leave the election rules and regulations as they are today to help our future brothers and sisters to have the right to get a faster election	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Jeffrey Kingsley	Keep the regulations the same	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Jim Conaghan #134	Our Union is Corrupt. Change is needed. #3 Rescind the Election Rules. We need to clean up the bad unions that are destroying our country!	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Jason Rasinski	Retain the current 2014 Election Rule without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Peter Kurland	Please retain the election regulations without change. Any changes will produce uncertainty and will require all governed parties to reconfigure their methods. This will be expensive and disruptive.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Bob Carroll	Revert back to the prior representation election regulations. Please see attachment for reasons behind this request.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
David Johnson	Please keep the election rules the same.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Mike Olszanski	Retain 2014 election rule without change!	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Kevin Cavato	Please do not make any changes to election regulations. Thank You, Kevin Cavato	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Susan Kehoe	The request for information about the representation of electrical regulations should NOT be changed. Please keep the regulations the same. Changes will only slow down the process.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Joseph Donahue	The 2014 election rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Ricardo Torres	Revert back to the 2014 Election Rules. See attachment for arguments supporting my recommendation.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Eric leanos	The 2014 election rule should be retained without change	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Mark A. Show IATSE 322	Do not change the rules. Leave them as they are. No change is necessary.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Theo F Parsons	I am writing to request that you keep the 2014 election rules in place. Employee freedom to join together and collective bargain needs to be protected from undue company interference, bullying, and intimidation.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Chriostopher Cerda	See attached	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Massimo Grassano	Leave as is.	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Wayne Colosimo	Leave the election alone!!!	No Attachments	2018-01-31
James J Kennedy	LEAVE THE ELECTION RULES AS THEY ARE!	No Attachments	2018-01-31
Elbert Walters III	I request the election rules remain as they are. No changes needed to the current election rules.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Douglas E Setmeyer	the 2014 Election Rule be retained without change	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Gary Parks	There is no need to change the current regulations. Leave them as they currently exist.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
John Fahey	Please leave the election procedures as they were in the 2014 election. My family depends on this.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Thomas M Wahl I B E W Local 134	leave our election rules as they are.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
William Guinane	The 2014 Election rules should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Bonny	___123___Request For Information \| NLRBs___123___	No Attachments	2018-01-30
robert a fleischer	Please leave the election rule as it is.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Brian Bennett	1)Yes 2)No modifications 3)Do not resceind the 2014 election rule	No Attachments	2018-01-30
DL	Leave the election rules as they are today to help our future brothers and sisters have the right to get a faster election. The current administration is attacking Unions once more and trying to slow this process down.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Jerrold Hymen	Question 1 - Yes, Please retain the 2014 election rules without changes or modifications, despite pressure from the Governor. Question 2 - No Modifications are needed. Question 3 - No, leave 2014 Election Rules as-is.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
tom Kuebler	Leave things the way they are today.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Eileen Cunningham	Leave the election laws as they are currently.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Dean Hinderman	Please leave the regulations as they are now	No Attachments	2018-01-30
William Hanetho	Please leave the election rules as they are now.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Anonymous	leave as is	No Attachments	2018-01-30
James cassidy	I believe that the 2014 election rule should be retained with out any changes. Thank you very much	No Attachments	2018-01-30
John Amelse	Leave as is	No Attachments	2018-01-30
John Amelse	Leave as is	No Attachments	2018-01-30
John Amelse	Leave as is	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Cary Bonnett	Leave as is.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Don Finn	Please rescind the current election rule and revert back to the regulations which were in effect prior to the 2014 election rules adoption.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Don J Carlson	The Unions are Corrupt!!! Time for a change!	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Anonymous	The rules should be retained without change	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Jim Conaghan Local 134 IBEW	Please rescind the current election rule and revert back to the regulations which were in effect prior to the 2014 election rules adoption.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Michael McNally, SPHR, SHRM-SCP	he 2014 Election Rules need to be rescinded in their entirety. An election period of less than 20 day is unfair to the both parties. Former rules, allowing for a 6-week period, is more reasonable to both parties	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Josh Janeczko	The rules should be left as is.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Mark Cooper	We should keep the rules in place that were established in 2014. If any changes at all are implemented they should shorten the time even more	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Anonymous	Leave the election rules alone	No Attachments	2018-01-30
G. Pittman	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained. The current rule seems to provide greater certainty about disputed issues, resulting in more stipulated elections and shorter appeal times, but more data is needed to determine whether changes are needed.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Susan M Allen	LEAVE THE ELECTION RULES AS THEY ARE TODAY LEAVE THE ELECTION RULES AS THEY ARE TODAY Leave the election rules as they are today Leave the election rules as they are today..... THANK YOU	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Howard Zic	Do not change the 2014 Election Rule!!	No Attachments	2018-01-30
William R. Hincks	The 2014 election rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
William P Collins	Please leave the election rules alone	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Michael Gedmin	Please leave the election rules the way they are now!	No Attachments	2018-01-30
David A McHugh	Please leave it the way it is. We like our unions	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Edward Dwyer	Leave the election rules the same as they are today.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
John Dowling	Keep it the way it is. Workers need rights	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Russell Hengels we	Leave the law the way it is	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Richard Aretz	Retain the 2014 Election Rule without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
JAMES COPPOCK	LEAVE THE RULE AS IT IS WITH NO CHANGE	No Attachments	2018-01-30
George Czarnik	Leave the rule as it is. No changes	No Attachments	2018-01-30
James Batka	I think this new rule is bad and should be dismissed.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
William Longenbaugh	See attached	No Attachments	2018-01-30
David Houston	Leave the rules the same as they are today	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Roberto Feliciano	Leave the election rules as they are today...	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Ramon Rowery	No change to the 2014 Election rules.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Bridget	Please leave the current rules as they are. Do not make any changes.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Kevin Connolly	Leave the election rules as they are now.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Michael Sears	leave the election rules as they are today	No Attachments	2018-01-30
William-IBEW Local 134	Please rescind the current election rule and revert back to the regulations which were in effect prior to the 2014 election rules adoption.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Jack-Roofers Local #11-Retired	Please rescind the current election rule and revert back to the regulations which were in effect prior to the 2014 election rules adoption.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
John Gallez	Question #1 - Yes, Please retain the 2014 election rules without change or modifications. Question #2 - No Modifications. Question #3 - No Leave 2014 Election Rules AS Is.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Erick Brekke	Please retain the 2014 Election rule without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
George Menton Jr. Local 134 IBEW	Please do not make any changes to the Election Rule	No Attachments	2018-01-30
David A. Kairis	NLRB should contniue using Request #1, Yes, the 2014 Election Rule be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Joe B	The new rules have been inherently unfair for businesses and their efforts to communicate the costs of unionization in the workplace. Eliminate the new rules, and revert back to the former pre-2014 rules.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Joseph Speropoulos	The Election Rule be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Brian C. Peterson	Keep the rules as they are.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Timothy Guido	Leave election process the way it is	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Frank Glorioso jr.	The 2014 election rules are adequate and should not be changed.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Norman Ebert	Please leave it with NO change .	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Frank chesniak	I would like you to not change any of the rules. They should not be touched	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Michael Haines	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Denis Cleary	2014 Election Rule be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Therese Fleming	Leave election rules as they are	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Anthony Pecaro	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Phil Piper	The existing rules are adequate.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Kevin Oeser	The existing system should be left alone, no changes need to be made.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Datro T. Cartman	Leave the election rules as they are.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Ted Bandur	Leave alone	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Larry Cullerton	Leave as is	No Attachments	2018-01-30
James Hogan	Leave it alone. Stop busting down the working man.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Donald Johnson	Retain without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Andre Aguilar	Please leave the election rules as they are today to help my future brothers and sisters have the right to get a faster election.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
John D ( local 134 )	Do not change rules.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Troy Risk	Leave current regulations as is. No changes	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Tommy o 134	Revert to before 2014 elections.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Thomas L Opyd Jr	Leave alone.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Thomas L Opyd Jr	Leave alone.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Thomas L Opyd Jr	Leave everything alone.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Thomas L Opyd Jr	Please send me more info. Thank you.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Raef meves	Please leave the election rule as they are.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Raef meves	Please leave the election rule as they are.	No Attachments	2018-01-30
Tom Reet	Please leave election rules as is,no changes	No Attachments	2018-01-29
John K. (IBEW 134)	I see no need to change anything in the current process. There is sufficient efficiency, and I believe any changes in this process will result in delays in election. I believe the current process is fair and just.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
James Wright	Leave the language as is. Stop messing around with our voting rights.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
steve affarano	Leave the election rules as they are today.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Mike Mokszycki	Please leave the rules as they are today.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Cornell Hudson	Leave everything alone, no changes.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Robert Sedlack	Leave the 2014 election rule as it is today and retain it without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Mark Connolly	Keep the rules that we have for our votes	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Mark connolly	Keep the way we vote by the rules we have now	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Robert Sullivan	Remain without change!	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Robert C. Rayburn Jr.	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. It is working for the working people.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Mark Berchman	Please leave the election rules as they are today in order to help working people have the right to a faster recognition election. The new proposal is unfair to unions by trying to slow the workplace election process down.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Kevin Pierce	The 2014 Election rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Stephen A. Brescia	I think the 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Patrick Hassett	Please leave the election rules the way they are. Do not change them.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Michael A King	Leave the current standard in place it has worked in the past and will continue to work into the future. Elections are nessary for the changing times and they work. I strongly suggest you leave the current rules in place.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Greg Paddack	Please retain the 2014 Election rule without change	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Matthew E Doran	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Pete Schwartz	Please leave election rules as they are	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Thomas Mangan	retain rule without change	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Sam Menton	Please leave the current election rules in place to allow a fellow brother to his right to get a fast election.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Terry Eads	leave the election rules as they are to help my future brothers and sisters have the right to get a faster election.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Bill Carlson	The 2014 election rules should be retained with no change	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Westbrooke Bradley	Pls retain 2014 Election rule as is without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Westbrooke Bradley	Pls retain 2014 Election rule as is without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Timothy Prendergast	The 2014 Election Rule be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Mike Matayosian	Keep rules the same please.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Michael Sopkin	Please retain the 2014 election rule.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Duffy R McCann	Retained without change	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Patrick S Brennan	I feel that the 2014 election rules should be retained without change	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Jeff Marks	The 2014 Rule should be retained without change .	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Kara Maude	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Ed Rode	Leave the election rules as they are today	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Christian Schandel	Leave the election rules as they are today	No Attachments	2018-01-29
John P Certik	Leave nlrb rules as they are	No Attachments	2018-01-29
joe Dhooghe	Retain the 2014 Election Rule without change	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Ronald J. Perkins	Leave the election rules as they are.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
TIM MANNIX	Please the election process the same . Do not change the process	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Kurtis Vander Woude	Leave the election rules as they are today!	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Edward Scahill	The 2014 election rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Robert J King	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained WITHOUT change. These rules have improved the election process.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Tony Murphy LU # 134	Leave the 2014 election rule "As is". No change requured	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Lawrence H Sharon	I implore the NLRB board to please leave the rules that were put in place in December of 2014 alone without any changes. These rules were written for the protection of workers such as myself and put into place by a bi-partisan effort.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Anthony J. Murphy	Please leave the election rule as it is. No modufication is required.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Jack Lorch	Leave it as is without change	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Kostadin Valkov	Dear Sir/Madam, please,leave the Election rules as they are today!	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Joseph Iacopelli	Please leave alone do not touch it.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Sean Ryan	Leave the rules as they are	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Ed Spychalski	Please let it stay as it is.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Steven Bartell	Leave the election rules as they are. Do not make any changes.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Patrick Nickless	Leave the election rules as they are today to help the future brothers and sisters have the right to get a faster election	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Jerry Taylor	There is no need for change. Change the fact that Congress continues to get a paycheck when the government shutdown,then watch how fast they come to an agreement.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
John Zachacki local 134	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change	No Attachments	2018-01-29
RONALD N LINDQUIST	Leave them alone works fine	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Mildred F. Leonard	I believe that the 2014 NLRB rules should remain as is, without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Reggie D. Mosley	No changes needed!	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Edwin Quezada	Leave the election rules as they are!	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Jerry O. Henderson	Do not change the election dates . it would delay the election process.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Mike Sonin	The existing 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
James Hannigan	There should be NO CHANGES MADE, LEAVE WHAT WORKS ALONE.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Chris Lamparski	Retain without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Roberto Belmontes	Leave it alone- I prefer things the way they are	No Attachments	2018-01-29
john harris	I believe they should be left the way they are	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Michael Flynn	I believe full heartedly that they should leave the elections as is. Keep them just how they have been. Thanks!	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Larry Garner	Leave the election rules as they are today to help our future brothers and sisters have the right to get a faster election.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Ron Kesselring	Please leave the election rules as they are today to help our future union brothers and sisters to have the right to get a faster election.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Richard cook	Leave the rules alone	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Christopher Pawell	The 2014 Election rule should be retained without change for the future of all children.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Michael Kelly Local # 134	Leave the election rules as they are now.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Deirdre Pwell	The 2014 Election Rules should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Michael Scheimann	Leave the election rules as they are today	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Michael Scheimann	Leave the election rules as they are today	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Michael Scheimann	Leave the election rules as they are today	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Brad Starkey	Please leave all rules the way they are	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Frank Cunningham	The rules regarding representation elections should not be changed. I repeat, the rules should not be changed.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Bob Van Wetering	Leave existing laws alone	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Gilbert Wallerstein	The election rules should be left as they are presently.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Jim Conaghan #134	The 2014 Election Rule should be rescinded and reverted to the Representation Election Regulations that were in effect prior to the 2014 Election Rule’s adoption.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Timothy M Cuga-Moylan	The 2014 Election Rule be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
William Sullivan	Please retain the current election rule without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Anonymous	1	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Tom Mazzola	Leave rules as they are	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Frank Pucher	Leave the election rules as they are today. NO CHANGES!	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Robert Bodeman	Retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Mike Staley	Leave it alone	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Joe Lutsky	2014 Election Rule be retained without change. We need unions due to the City of Chicago took away the retires medical benefits this has case has been in the courts for over 30 years. All of the unions need to get involved and protect members.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Anonymous	leave the election rules as they are today	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Dennis Dunleavy	Please retain election rules as they are today without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Thom a. Davis	The 2014 election rules should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Tim Ryan	The election rule should stay the same as it is now	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Patrick Murphy	Please DO NOT make any changes to the existing 2014 Election Rule. The middle class is struggling enough - please don't hurt us further by changing these rules. Thank You	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Mark Wrobel	Please leave the elections just as they are with no modifications.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Dale Smith	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
John Krueger	leave the way that are.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
John Krueger	leave the way that are.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Patrick S	Retained without change	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Ronald Laade	Leave the rules the same as they are now.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
john mullooly	please keep things as they have been. there is no need to change the rules	No Attachments	2018-01-29
DeWayne Johnson	Leave everything as they are, don’t change the rules.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Eder F	Please leave it how it is don’t change it!	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Samuel Meroni	Please retain the 2014 election rule without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Mike norton	Leave the rules as they are today	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Derek Williams	Leave the election rules the way they are today	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Anonymous	DO NOT CHANGE THE RULES	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Ulysses V Ruff	Yes	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Edward Sackey	Should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Edward Sackey	Should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
James Lennon	Please retain the 2014 election rules without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Donald H Garon	There is no need for any chang.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Steven C Trongeau	Do not change it. Leave the 2014 rules alone	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Daniel Griffin	Leave rules the way they are make no changes	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Lisa Julien	Leave as is!	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Timothy Hanrahan	Please retain the 2014 election rule without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Ardell Brown	Leave the rules as they are today.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Wendy J. Cordts	There is no problem with the election rules as the stand today. There is no reason to change them in any manner. They do not need to be modified in any manner. And they definitely should NOT BE RESCINDED. They should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Adam Prine	1. Yes, leave them as is. 2. No modifications to the current rule. 3. No.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Mike Jones	Leave the election rules as they are today	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Peggy Retherford	Please rescind the 2014 rule. If workers truly want to become part of a Union, a longer election cycle will not change the outcome. It will however allow time for those who want to fully understand the process to gather important information.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Thomas Sliwinski	Leave the rules as they are now.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
HENRY CIACCIA	LEAVE THE RULES AS THEY ARE TODAY	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Jerome	No rule change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Jean Hincks	Yes, the 2014 election rule should be retained without change. Please leave election rules as they are today so our future brothers & sisters have the right to get a faster election.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Richard Ocasil	Q1-Yes, election rule should be retained without change. Q2-NO Q3-NO, rules election rules should be kept same as currently being used.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Michael Treslo	Leave the rules alone!	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Robert H Lohens	Leave the 2014 Election Rule alone and retain it	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Cheryl Busking	Don't change it.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Jose Barrios	Leave it as is. Do not change	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Brian Flanagan	Please leave the election rules as they are today.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Bob Witt	Please leave the election rules alone.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Tim	Leave 2014 rule in effect don't change anything	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Anonymous	Leave it alone	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Andrew Truesdale	Please leave election rules as they are today	No Attachments	2018-01-29
John sokolowski	please leave election rules as they are today ! Thank you	No Attachments	2018-01-29
John A DeVos	the 2014 Election Rule be retained without change	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Brian W. Maciejewski	Please leave the 2014 election rule retain without modification.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Anonymous	Leave it alone	No Attachments	2018-01-29
William Cusack	Leave current election rules as they are.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Jt	Leave the 2014 election rule retained as is	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Anonymous	Leave the 2014 election rule retained as is	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Brian Kaminski	The 2014 rule should remain unchanged.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
WILLIAM F HAFFNER	The election role should remain unchanged	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Gary	1. Yes, I believe the rule should be retained. 2. No, I believe the rule should be retained. 3. No, I believe the rule should be retained. Thank you	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Timothy Arendt	Please leave the 2014 election for representation rule unchanged. The entire purpose of the NLRB in 1933-35 was to protect employee rights and to level the playing field with employers. This is not the time to weaken these rights	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Donald Finn	Please rescind the current election rule and revert back to the regulations which were in effect prior to the 2014 election rules adoption.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Richard Aycock	The 2014 election rule SHOULD BE RETAINED WITHOUT CHANGE.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Timothy Hanrahan	Please retain the 2014 election rule without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Andre Ellis	Please leave the election rules as they are today to help are future brothers and sisters to have the right to get a faster election.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
Sean Pierce	The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change.	No Attachments	2018-01-29
David Swanston	Leave the election rules as they are today.	No Attachments	2018-01-29