Request for Information Submissions
| Name | Response Sort descending | Attachments | Submitted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gregory Grundl | The 2014 Election rule should be retained without change. | No Attachments |
2018-04-05 |
| Jennifer Garner | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. Employees are better able to make a free choice, while employers have not been disadvantaged. Please keep the rule in its present form. | No Attachments |
2018-04-04 |
| Hammond and Shinners | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. Please see attached. | No Attachments |
2018-04-13 |
| Frank Prochaska | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. The rule reduced the amount of unnecessary delay in the election process. The existing rule has successfully reduced time and administrative burden from this process and should be retained. | No Attachments |
2018-04-10 |
| Robert J King | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained WITHOUT change. These rules have improved the election process. | No Attachments |
2018-01-29 |
| Robert C. Rayburn Jr. | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. It is working for the working people. | No Attachments |
2018-01-29 |
| William Funari | The 2014 election rule should be retained without change. It was a majir imorivement. | No Attachments |
2018-04-09 |
| Adam DeRose | The 2014 election rule should be retained without change. It's important for workers to have speedy NLRB elections. | No Attachments |
2017-12-15 |
| Ann peek | The 2014 election rule should be retained without change. Keep the regulations without change. | No Attachments |
2018-01-27 |
| James Whalen | The 2014 election rule should be retained without change. Please leave it as it is currently. | No Attachments |
2018-01-24 |
| Sarah E. Ruhlen, Esq. | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. The rule reduces litigation, eases the process for non-represented parties, and has not affected Employers' ability to campaign on their own behalf. The rule makes the election process fairer. | No Attachments |
2018-04-04 |
| Carolyn Akinbami | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. This rule reduces malicious delay when workers petition for an election to vote on forming a union at work. The rule works, helping to ensure workers a right to vote. | No Attachments |
2018-04-08 |
| David L. Heidbreder | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. This rule seems to level the playing field when it comes to the workers vs. the companies. | No Attachments |
2018-01-10 |
| Dale Johnson | The 2014 Election rule should be retained without change.Americas workers,who the president keeps promising to help,need all the help they can get.To rescind or weaken this rule would be a slap in our faces.Please keep the rule as is. | No Attachments |
2017-12-17 |
| Michael Coy Hill Jr | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change? It should be in place for several years in order to properly assess pros and cons. | No Attachments |
2018-04-05 |
| Brett Schock | The 2014 election rule should be retained without changes | No Attachments |
2018-04-04 |
| Ross McDonagh | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without changes as it has not only saved the American taxpayers countless tax dollars, but it has also assisted in the furtherance of the aims of the NLRA to encourage collective bargaining. | No Attachments |
2018-03-31 |
| Bess Sullivan | The 2014 Election rule should be retained without changes or modifications. It should not be rescinded as doing so would bring harm to the workers of our great nation. | No Attachments |
2018-01-24 |
| MARY JILL HANSON | the 2014 Election Rule should be retained without changes. These were only common sense rules, such as are in effect in other jurisdictions, for example, under the public employee law in Florida. | No Attachments |
2018-02-03 |
| Rick Thompson | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without modification. Employers can communicate about unions/collective bargaining at any time regardless of an organizing effort; protracted elections favor them, delaying the right of employees to organize. | No Attachments |
2018-01-25 |
| Craig Stearns | The 2014 election rule should be retained without modifications | No Attachments |
2018-02-08 |
| Katherine Galagan | The 2014 election rule should be retained without modifications. It is working well. | No Attachments |
2018-04-08 |
| Mark Quinn | The 2014 election rule should be retained, unmodified, and certainly should NOT be rescinded. | No Attachments |
2018-01-29 |
| Brent McFarlane | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained. Please keep the rule in its present form. | No Attachments |
2018-04-04 |
| Rob Callahan | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained. Additional regulations should be put in place granting labor organizations equal time and equal access in instances in which employers use work hours to conduct union avoidance campaigns. | No Attachments |
2018-04-17 |
| G. Pittman | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained. The current rule seems to provide greater certainty about disputed issues, resulting in more stipulated elections and shorter appeal times, but more data is needed to determine whether changes are needed. | No Attachments |
2018-01-30 |
| Allan Hettinger | The 2014 Election Rule should be totaly rescinded. | No Attachments |
2018-04-16 |
| Tony Hawk | The 2014 Election Rule should definitely be rescinded. | No Attachments |
2017-12-14 |
| Raymundo Sanchez Jr | The 2014 election rule should not be changed | No Attachments |
2018-01-24 |
| Michael Hill | The 2014 election rule should not be changed and should be retained as is! | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Quinn Ercolani | The 2014 election rule should not be modified. Modifications would disadvantage workers and delay proceedings unnecessarily. | No Attachments |
2018-01-20 |
| Jonah Nelson | The 2014 Election Rule should not be rescinded. If any changes are made to the rule, it should be to make it easier for employees to vote without delay, obstacles, or employer interference | No Attachments |
2018-04-05 |
| Anonymous | The 2014 Election Rule should not be rescinded. The NLRA is supposed to protect employees’ right to freely vote. If any changes are made, it should be to make it easier for employees to vote without delay, obstacles, or employer interference. | No Attachments |
2018-04-08 |
| Scott Kozokas | The 2014 election rule should retained without change. | No Attachments |
2018-01-28 |
| Cynthia Sauter | The 2014 Election Rule should revert back. Shortening the time frame from petition to election denies an Employer their opportunity to wage an appropriate communication campaign designed to allow an Employee to make an educated choice. | No Attachments |
2018-03-14 |
| Frank Glorioso jr. | The 2014 election rules are adequate and should not be changed. | No Attachments |
2018-01-30 |
| Stephen Rockafellow | The 2014 election rules should be kept without change. Employers abused delays inherent in the old system to unlawfully pressure employees into submission. Rescinding the 2014 Rule is not in the best interests of our nation, its workers, or the NLRB. | No Attachments |
2018-01-24 |
| Bill Carlson | The 2014 election rules should be retained with no change | No Attachments |
2018-01-29 |
| Thom a. Davis | The 2014 election rules should be retained without change. | No Attachments |
2018-01-29 |
| Michael Lake | The 2014 Election rules should be retained without change. | No Attachments |
2018-01-24 |
| Deirdre Pwell | The 2014 Election Rules should be retained without change. | No Attachments |
2018-01-29 |
| William Guinane | The 2014 Election rules should be retained without change. | No Attachments |
2018-01-30 |
| Charles L Harper | The 2014 election rules should be retained. | No Attachments |
2018-01-25 |
| Steve Cox | The 2014 election rules should be revised to allow at least 6 weeks between the filing of a petition and the election. To have less time for election campaign period violates core principle of free & fair elections. | No Attachments |
2017-12-13 |
| PATRICK STANLEY | the 2014 Election Ruling in question should be recinded!! | No Attachments |
2018-04-17 |
| Ronald Cobbs | The 2014 election should be rescinded and go back to the representation election regulations that were in effect prior to 2014 election rules adoption | No Attachments |
2018-04-18 |
| Michael McNally | The 2014 Elections laws need to be entirely rescinded and we need to return to the former election rules, i.e., 42-Day Period. The current laws do not give the parties ample time to thoroughly discuss the pros/cons of unionization. | No Attachments |
2018-02-01 |
| Gene Swartz | The 2014 Elections laws need to be entirely rescinded and we need to return to the former election rules, i.e., 42-Day Period. The current laws do not give the parties ample time to thoroughly discuss the pros/cons of unionization. | No Attachments |
2018-02-02 |
| William R Farrar | The 2014 law is unfair and should be rescinded. Unions must regularly recertify majority support without restrictions.Workers should not to forced to pay union dues. | No Attachments |
2018-04-15 |
| John D. Sager | The 2014 NLRB election rule should be retained. Any change to lengthen the the election time frame will result in increased employer intimidation against the free will of employees. | No Attachments |
2017-12-22 |