Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

News & Publications

Newspapers

Record Backpay Award in CNN Case

Office of Public Affairs
202-273-1991
publicinfo@nlrb.gov
www.nlrb.gov

On January 10, 2020, the National Labor Relations Board, CNN America, Inc., and Local 11 and Local 31 of the National Association of Broadcast Employees and Technicians (NABET), Communications Workers of America (CWA), AFL-CIO, signed a settlement in which CNN agreed to pay $76 million in backpay, the largest monetary remedy in the history of the National Labor Relations Board.  The backpay amount is expected to benefit over 300 individuals.  The dispute originated in 2003 when CNN terminated a contract with Team Video Services (TVS), a company that had been providing CNN video services in Washington, D.C., and New York City.  After terminating the contract, CNN hired new employees to perform the same work without recognizing or bargaining with the two unions that had represented the TVS employees.  CNN sought to operate as a nonunion workplace and conveyed to the workers that their prior employment with TVS and union affiliation disqualified them from employment.  After a lengthy hearing in 2008, which was litigated by a team of NLRB attorneys including Susannah Ringel, Allen Rose, and Leah Jaffe of Region 2, an administrative law judge found that CNN’s actions violated the National Labor Relations Act and that CNN was a successor to, and joint employer with, TVS.  In 2014, the National Labor Relations Board agreed and ordered CNN to bargain with the unions and provide backpay.  361 NLRB 439 (2014)  Later, in 2017, a panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, including Chief Judge Merrick Garland and then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh, adopted the majority of the Board’s findings, and enforced the Board’s order that CNN cease and desist from refusing to recognize and bargain with the unions.  However, the court remanded the Board’s joint employer finding for further clarification, along with the issue of backpay for further consideration by the Board.  After the case was remanded, the parties agreed to resolve their dispute through the Board’s Alternative Dispute Resolution program.  Numerous Board staff worked diligently with all concerned parties to reach this settlement.  General Counsel Peter B. Robb noted that “the settlement demonstrates the Board’s continued commitment to enforcing the law and ensuring employees who were treated unfairly obtain the monetary relief ordered by the Board.”