Request for Information Submissions
| Name | Response | Attachments | Submitted Sort ascending |
|---|---|---|---|
| David L. Heidbreder | The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. This rule seems to level the playing field when it comes to the workers vs. the companies. | No Attachments |
2018-01-10 |
| John Kahrhoff | The Rule helps offset the advantage Employers have with regards to collective action by workers. Along w/ captive audience meetings after filing, employers have more economic resources than workers. One real-life example is shown in the attached. | No Attachments |
2018-01-10 |
| llama | Llamas are a key and vital part of this society because he is king!!!!! Jeff the Llama is awesome!!! | No Attachments |
2018-01-09 |
| Jerry Reed | The 2014 rule should not be retained and should be rescinded. The decision to elect union representation is a difficult one for employees. They want to hear both sides of an argument to make an informed decision. | No Attachments |
2018-01-04 |
| Elle Farmer | (1) Yes, NLRB should retain the 2014 Election Rule without Change (2) Absent Yes to question (1), yes, NLRB should retain with minimal, non-substantial changes. (3) No. NLRB should not rescind the 2014 Election rules | No Attachments |
2018-01-03 |
| David S. Addington | See attachment | No Attachments |
2018-01-03 |
| Brandon Elvey | These questions have already been asked and answered a few years ago. There are no issues with the Elections rules, therefore they should remain unchanged. See attachment for further response. | No Attachments |
2018-01-02 |
| Anonymous | The dissenting views of member Mark Gaston Pearce and member Lauren McFerran are compelling. The 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change. | No Attachments |
2018-01-01 |
| Brad Meyer | After living through multiple violations by AUTONATION in 2008 including threats and firings in order to scare the workers against unionization I vote TO KEEP the current set of election rules set forth in 2014. | No Attachments |
2017-12-28 |
| L G Hansen | I respond to the above questions: Item 3 shall be my choice with rules reverting to old rules. Thank you | No Attachments |
2017-12-26 |
| John D. Sager | The 2014 NLRB election rule should be retained. Any change to lengthen the the election time frame will result in increased employer intimidation against the free will of employees. | No Attachments |
2017-12-22 |
| Kendra Saunders | I request that NLRBRequest for information regarding representation election regulations. | No Attachments |
2017-12-22 |
| Louis Galluzzo | Ruke does not need any changes | No Attachments |
2017-12-21 |
| Scott C. Eickholt | Leave the rule unchanged. NLRB was created to protect the WORKERS not the business. The rule is appropriate for a fair election process. Change would undermine the workers ability to organize. History shows the business works to divide the workers. | No Attachments |
2017-12-21 |
| Scott C. Eickholt | Leave the rule unchanged. NLRB was created to protect the WORKERS not the business. The rule is appropriate for a fair election process. Change would undermine the workers ability to organize. History shows the business works to divide the workers. | No Attachments |
2017-12-21 |
| karen mercer | no change | No Attachments |
2017-12-21 |
| Amit Kumar | Sir/mam, My name is Amit Kumar. Graduate in civil engineering. Seeking for a job. Kindly excuse my request. Thank you. | No Attachments |
2017-12-21 |
| Larry Jarvis | Retain 2014 election rules | No Attachments |
2017-12-20 |
| Jason Biniasz | The rule should be retained without change. | No Attachments |
2017-12-20 |
| Jason Jenkins | I am requesting that the 2014 Election rule be retained without any alteration | No Attachments |
2017-12-20 |
| Bob Cantore | It should be retained without modifications. | No Attachments |
2017-12-19 |
| Bob Cantore | It should be retained without modifications. | No Attachments |
2017-12-19 |
| Bob Cantore | It should be retained without modifications. | No Attachments |
2017-12-19 |
| Stephen Mellgard | Retained without changing... | No Attachments |
2017-12-19 |
| Charles E. Tubbs | The 2014 Election Rule be retained without change | No Attachments |
2017-12-19 |
| David S. Addington for Nat'l Fed'n of Independent Business (NFIB) | NFIB comments of 12/19/2017 on Request for Information on "Representation-Case Procedures," 82 Fed. Reg. 58783 (12/14/2017) are attached. | No Attachments |
2017-12-19 |
| Chad Rennison | The election rule should be retained with no revisions or modifications. Keep it the SAME. Speeding up elections hinders employee harassment by their employer for wanting a voice in their workplace. | No Attachments |
2017-12-19 |
| Charles Skelly | Election rule should be retained without changes. It streamlines the process properly. | No Attachments |
2017-12-19 |
| Chris Horton | The 2014 Election Rule be retained without change | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Ray Trudell | This rule be retained. It does not need charging. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Kenneth Doogan | Please retain the 2014 Election Rule without change! | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Eric Theobald | Please no changes to the rule | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Marie Lobbezoo | The 2014 Election Rule should be rescinded. The Representation Election Rules in place prior to the 2014 Rule were adequate. "Ambush" elections were leading employees to be given inadequate information in a short period. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Jim Leatherman | Do not change the election rules for unions | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Tim Blandford | Yes the 2014 Election Rule should be retained without change | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| CL | I think the 2014 Election Rule should be rescinded. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Harry lim | No change | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Daniel J. Libby | #1 the 2014 rule should stay the same with no change | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Michael Hill | The 2014 election rule should not be changed and should be retained as is! | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Timothy Oppel | No change. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Bo | Keep it as is or if any changes are made , it is in benefit of the unions. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Kendra Fite | No, the Election Rule should not be retained, no modifications at all. The 2014 Election rule should be rescinded. This is harmful to businesses, especially small businesses who can not afford the cost of these changes. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Nathan Knott | I believe the voting rules need to remain the same! | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Mike Van Winkle | The current election rule should be retained WITHOUT any changes or modifications being made. The 2014 election rule speeds up the process and the employees are subject to less intimidation because of the rule. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Chris Brooks | The 2014 election rule absolutely should be retained without change. Workers deserve quick and fair NLRB elections. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| John Ertl | Research from Cornell's Kate Bronfenbrenner proves that that the longer employers have to violate the Act, the more egregious and systematic their illegal tactics become. The 2014 Election Rule is a no-brainer and should be kept. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Chris Spivey | Keep the ruling the same as it is. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Katie Zucconi | Yes:2014 Election Rule retained without change. No:changes to the rule. No the rule should not be rescinded. Make it easier for employees to gain representation with a union and keep the "speedy election" rule so employees have a fair chance. | No Attachments |
2017-12-18 |
| Todd Gardner | The election rule should NOT change! The rule helps protect the worker from the employer and their hired thugs(Union Busters, Attorneys)! Protect the worker! | No Attachments |
2017-12-17 |
| JORDAN GALLEGOS | Yes for 2014 Election Rule retained without change. No for changes to the Rule. No the Rule should not be rescinded. Make it easier for employees to gain representation with a union and keep the “speedy election” rule so employees have a fair chance. | No Attachments |
2017-12-17 |